<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>VT Special crimes &#187; cyber</title>
	<atom:link href="http://vtspecialcrimes.org/category/cyber/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://vtspecialcrimes.org</link>
	<description>Criminal cases</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 02:01:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Email interception penalty</title>
		<link>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/12/email-interception-penalty/</link>
		<comments>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/12/email-interception-penalty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 01:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>musi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vtspecialcrimes.org/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Email Interception Defense Considerations
The company faced a maximum penalty of $250,000 on each count of the Information. As part of a plea agreement with the U.S. Attorneys Office which was approved by a U.S. District Court Judge, the company agreed to pay a total fine in the amount of $250,000.
This case was investigated by the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="left">Email Interception Defense Considerations</p>
<p><span>The company faced a maximum penalty of $250,000 on each count of the Information. As part of a plea agreement with the U.S. Attorneys Office which was approved by a U.S. District Court Judge, the company agreed to pay a total fine in the amount of $250,000.</p>
<p>This case was investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Massachusetts State Police. The case was prosecuted by Jeanne M. Kempthorne, Chief of Sterns Public Corruption and Special Prosecutions Unit. </span></p>
<p><span>From : </span>http://www.uniteddefensegroup.com/crimes_email_interception.htm</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/12/email-interception-penalty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK Penalty for email interception</title>
		<link>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/10/uk-penalty-for-email-interception/</link>
		<comments>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/10/uk-penalty-for-email-interception/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>musi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vtspecialcrimes.org/?p=14</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Penalty in UK for email interception 
Clifford Stanford, the founder of Demon Internet and Redbus and Codefendant George Liddell, a former employee of Redbus,  pleaded guilty to email interception. Both men were sentenced to six months imprisonment, suspended for two years. Stanford was also fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £7,000 towards prosecution costs. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Penalty in UK for email interception </p>
<p>Clifford Stanford, the founder of Demon Internet and Redbus and Codefendant George Liddell, a former employee of Redbus,  pleaded guilty to email interception. Both men were sentenced to six months imprisonment, suspended for two years. Stanford was also fined £20,000 and ordered to pay £7,000 towards prosecution costs. </p>
<p>Stanford and Liddell were charged under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 with intercepting emails belonging to John Porter, son of Dame Shirley Porter and former chairman of Redbus.</p>
<p>More from http://news.zdnet.co.uk/itmanagement/0,1000000308,39218357,00.htm </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/10/uk-penalty-for-email-interception/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c.23) (RIP or RIPA)</title>
		<link>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/07/regulation-of-investigatory-powers-act-2000-c-23-rip-or-ripa/</link>
		<comments>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/07/regulation-of-investigatory-powers-act-2000-c-23-rip-or-ripa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:53:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>musi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[crime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyber]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[email]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://vtspecialcrimes.org/?p=10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c.23) (RIP or RIPA) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, regulating the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, and covering the interception of communications. It was introduced to take account of technological change such as the growth of the Internet [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 (c.23) (RIP or RIPA) is an Act of the Parliament of the United Kingdom, regulating the powers of public bodies to carry out surveillance and investigation, and covering the interception of communications. It was introduced to take account of technological change such as the growth of the Internet and strong encryption.</p>
<p>RIPA can be invoked by government officials specified in the Act on the grounds of national security, and for the purposes of preventing or detecting crime, preventing disorder, public safety, protecting public health, or in the interests of the economic well-being of the United Kingdom.</p>
<p>Reference : http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/ukpga_20000023_en_1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://vtspecialcrimes.org/2009/07/regulation-of-investigatory-powers-act-2000-c-23-rip-or-ripa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
